Monthly Archive April 2015

ByMichael Morrison

Notification duration for marital relationships and civil collaborations extended

New plans planned to prevent sham marital relationships

This, together with closer joint working with registrars, has resulted in over 2,000 reports of believed sham cases between July and December 2014– up by over 80 % compared to the exact same period the year prior to (1,099).

Where a sham is believed, couples may undergo an extended notification period of 70 days, to allow investigators additional time to consider whether the proposed marriage is a sham.

The new arrangements– part of the government’s Immigration Act, which ended up being law in 2013– represent the greatest shake-up of marital relationship and civil collaboration preliminaries in recent times. The changes will give the Home Office more time to examine whether couples are trying to flout the migration system.

The latest steps to prevent sham marriages indicate that the notification period for marriage and civil collaboration has been extended from 15 days to 28 days.

The brand-new powers improve previous modifications under the Immigration Act introduced in July in 2014 which widened the duty on registrars to report thought sham marriages to the Home Office.

Migration and Security Minister James Brokenshire stated:

Non-EU nationals who try to take part or organise in a sham marriage face being right away detained until their enforced elimination. Any outstanding leave to stay can be curtailed.

The government has actually likewise presented brand-new elimination and re-entry ban powers for EU nationals who try to abuse free movement rights by participating in sham marital relationships for cash.

In between April and December 2014, the Home Office carried out over 2,000 sham marital relationship operations leading to over 1,200 arrests and more than 430 illegal immigrants have been removed from the UK as a result.

“Marriage can no longer be seen as a ‘fast track option’ for those seeking to abuse marriage to cheat their method into the UK.”.

Share This:-
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedin
ByMichael Morrison

Neighbour Disputes & Sir Paul McCartney

Neighbour disputes whether concerning party walls or boundaries can incur disproportionate legal costs if advice is not sought timely from a specialist practitioner in the field.

A recent battle occurred in St John’s Wood between two neighbours of Sir Paul McCartney in Cavendish Avenue. Clive Lewis a chartered surveyor lives at 3, Brenda Fenton lives at 5 whilst Sir Paul lives at 7.

Last month a judgment in Mrs Fenton’s favour handed down at Central London County Court ordered Mr Lewis to pay her £250,000 in costs and to make alterations to his house over a gutter leak that if fixed timeously would have cost him £7000. If you add Mr Lewis’s own legal costs (barrister and solicitor) he is now facing a bill of around £500,000.

Mrs Fenton was represented by a member of the barristers’ chambers that have the strongest reputation for property issues.

We at the Solicitors Information Service can recommend solicitors in London with proven expertise in the speedy resolution of such matters.

 

 

Share This:-
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedin